Compare and contrast the different sources of literature that you have accessed and comment on their merits

Compare and contrast the different sources of literature that you have accessed and comment on their merits in terms of their:

Strength – Comparing the chronic disease indicators and the local health data, the former has more strength on SDOH. The main merit behind this chronic disease indicator and the local health data is that when one uses chronic indicators, there are improved outcomes in healthcare based on the SDOH. The main strength of chronic disease indicators is that some chronic outcomes indicators may be tailored to assess outcomes of interventions within the area in which I did the research. In addition, it will allow accountability, subsequent funding and enhances program planning for the public medical practice where I consulted, unlike the local health data where you must access the information from the medical facilities, and maybe the information may be corrupted.

Relevance to your professional context – All the literature sources are relevant in the research since they provide the required information needed. Their relevance is needed since the source provided me with the basic information and the needed research process. This property makes all the sources more and more relevant to refer to during the research process.

Reliability – Local health data is more reliable since one can find the needed information, but you can not collect the required information from a chronic individual suffering from chronic indicators. Information can be obtained from the local health facilities efficiently since more patients attend clinics for check-ups. Therefore, the reliability of information based on every patient is more than the chronic disease indicators. When you are conducting the research on a particular patient, and he or she is in a critical condition when one is conducting the research, obtaining information from the patient undergoing the problem will be a bit harder. This is because it takes longer to understand the chronic disease indicators accompanying the patient’s present state. Therefore, getting chronic disease indicators is unreliable when a researcher needs immediate information to understand since it requires much time to examine, unlike the local health data, which is a more reliable source of information.

Currency of the information. – Chronic disease indicators source may be an expensive source of information since you will be dealing with chronic individuals. To undergo all the processes to get the actual chronic disease indicators of a specific chronic condition, you might undergo some higher costs before you attain the actual results, unlike for Local Health data, which entails information accessible from the bodies in charge. These in charge bodies may be medical facilities. For instance, one can access information from a medical facility that a specific patient attends during clinic times. This access may not have expenses involved; hence this source is much cheaper than the chronic disease indicators.

  1. Assess and discuss the feasibility of incorporating the research findings into your professional context and any benefits or risks associated with this.

Legal feasibility – It evaluates if any aspect of the research on SDOH conflicts with the legal requirements, for example, social media laws. The main benefit of this assessment is that it facilitates risk management in the healthcare sector.

Technical feasibility – This valuation emphasizes the technical possessions already in the association. It has a benefit where it helps associations to determine if technical resources meet capacity. The idea of a mechanical working model is simpler to get a handle on and comprehend than web-based business, programming, or administration-related items in the topic of SDOH. Web-based business models require confirmation of coordinating the PCs, workers, programming, and programming expected to help the operational idea. Administrations, bundled as a bunch of significant worth added exercises, to convey noticeable advantages. The main benefit of technical feasibility is that it shows all the technical issues involved in the research process and how they will help in the research topic.

Economic feasibility – This feasibility entails how helpful SDOH research is before any allocation of resources is done. In addition, this feasibility improves decision-making in the organization.